← Search

Edward Rokus

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Melbourne, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 15W–8L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history23 matches
L
Reed Edelman / Howard Weinstein
2025-04-09 · Brevard/McGuigan/65&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Runda championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-08 · Brevard/McGuigan/65&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adrian Richard Verzaal championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-17 · Brevard/McGuigan/65&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tony Bender
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-02-10 · Brevard/McGuigan/65&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Selwyn Mitchell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-02-03 · Brevard/McGuigan/65&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Runda
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-01-20 · Brevard/McGuigan/65&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Max McDonald
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-03-11 · Fee - Westmoreland · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Dickens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-02-27 · Fee - Westmoreland · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Dickens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-02-13 · Fee - Westmoreland · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Maalt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
W
2024-02-12 · Fee - Westmoreland · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Dickens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-01-29 · Fee - Westmoreland · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Dickens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-01-22 · Fee - Westmoreland · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dan Honaker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
65.2%
15W–8L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer