← Search

Kevin Pease

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Falmouth, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
10 matches · 5W–5L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history10 matches
W
2025-06-03 · SSY:South Shore YMCA:Prudente · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Perola Andersson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-15 · FAL:Sugar/Sugar/Gwynn · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Arthur Gutch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-2
W
2025-03-01 · FAL:Sugar/Sugar/Gwynn · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Arthur Gutch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-01-18 · FAL:Sugar/Sugar/Gwynn · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Deignan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-03-30 · FSC:Sugar:Sugar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Wright
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-03-02 · FSC:Sugar:Sugar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Wright
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-3, 1-0
W
2023-12-09 · FSC:Sugar:Sugar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Roy Heffernan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-12-02 · FSC:Sugar:Sugar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Wright
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-7
L
2023-05-12 · MCAC:Harbilas:Harbilas · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kara Pease mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2021-10-30 · FSC:Sugar:Sugar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Bucchanio
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
8.0
50%
4W–4L · 49.7% of games
9.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal