← Search

Roseanne Kryjak

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Waterford, NY
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
29 matches · 7W–22L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history29 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Lavender Jazz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Johnson
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-08-05 · Lavender Jazz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Runkel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-29 · Lavender Jazz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Johnson
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-22 · Lavender Jazz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Runkel
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · Lavender Jazz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Johnson
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-08 · Lavender Jazz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Johnson
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-07-11 · Golden Divas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Tarantino
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-05 · Golden Divas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Tarantino
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-15 · Golden Divas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Hoffman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-02 · Golden Divas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Kelly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-21 · Lavender Jazz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Tarantino
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
2024-08-14 · Lavender Jazz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Kelly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
6.0
24.1%
7W–22L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova