← Search

Kathy Johnson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albany, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 8W–13L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history21 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Lavender Jazz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roseanne Kryjak
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-19 · Lavender Jazz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Metzger
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-29 · Lavender Jazz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roseanne Kryjak
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-22 · Lavender Jazz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Metzger
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · Lavender Jazz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roseanne Kryjak
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-08 · Lavender Jazz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roseanne Kryjak
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · Lavender Jazz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Richards
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-27 · Lavender Jazz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrea Das
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-30 · Lavender Jazz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrea Das
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-07-23 · Lavender Jazz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrea Das
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-09 · Lavender Jazz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrea Das
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-02 · Lavender Jazz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrea Das
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 39.9% of games
8.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams