← Search

Alicia Barnett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 15W–43L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history58 matches
L
2026-04-13 · ACAC PARRISH · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Parrish
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-06 · ACAC PARRISH · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margaret Peters
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-07-30 · 4 ACAC Parrish · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Barrett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-09 · 4 ACAC Parrish · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra Flight
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-25 · 4 ACAC Parrish · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margaret Peters
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-20 · ACAC Parrish 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margaret Peters
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-05-14 · ACAC Parrish 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Barrett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-05-12 · ACAC Parrish 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margaret Peters
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-04-18 · ACAC Parrish 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Barrett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-04-14 · ACAC Parrish 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Forbes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-02 · ACAC Linderman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Granger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2023-05-19 · ACAC Linderman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Granger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 39.8% of games
6.0
60%
6W–4L · 49.7% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 38.1% of games
7.0
12%
3W–22L · 36.8% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King