← Search

Alice Campbell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Spring, TX
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
8 matches · 4W–4L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history8 matches
W
2026-10-07 · Skehan-Geriatric Tennis Junkies 26-MNW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacquelyn Winters
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-09-02 · Skehan-Geriatric Tennis Junkies 26-MNW · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacquelyn Winters
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-01 · Skehan-Geriatric Tennis Junkies 25- MNW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Burke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-09-24 · Skehan-Geriatric Tennis Junkies 25- MNW · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Burke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2021-04-28 · Hill-0ver the Hill-Wendtwoods Park · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melinda Ramsey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2021-03-24 · Hill-0ver the Hill-Wendtwoods Park · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melinda Ramsey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2021-03-03 · Hill-0ver the Hill-Wendtwoods Park · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Claudia McFadden
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 63.5% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 63% of the time
#3 Doubles
63%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal