Virginia Anderson
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
GRANGER, IN
94 matches · 51W–43L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history94 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-5
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2025
NIN SB Weekday Combo 7.5W: Widner
NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: Widner
NIN SB Combo Day 7.5 W: SBRC Widner / Deitchley
NIN SB 55&O 8.0 W: SBRC Chmiel
NIN SB Combo 7.5 W: SBRC Widner / Deitchley
NIN SB Day 7.5 W Combo: SBRC Hawthorne
NIN SB Combo Day 7.5W: SBRC Hawthorne / Hutchko
NIN SB 7.5 W Combo Day: SBRC Huchko / Hawthorne
NIN SB 8.5 W Combo Day: SBRC Huchko / Hawthorne
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.7% of games
4.0
48%
12W–13L · 47.1% of games
7.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 55.7% of games
7.5
56%
14W–11L · 53.8% of games
8.0
25%
3W–9L · 37.8% of games
8.5
50%
4W–4L · 47.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.