← Search

Claytona Stockdale

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mesa, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 16W–47L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history63 matches
L
2024-11-06 · 8.0 PTC Stockdale W65F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Roberta Snow
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-03-20 · 8.0 PTC Stockdale W65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Mckeand
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 0-2
L
2024-02-14 · 8.0 PTC Stockdale W65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Mckeand
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
2024-01-31 · 8.0 PTC Stockdale W65S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Mckeand
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-12-16 · 8.0 ISP Williams W55F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Bluml
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-10-14 · 8.0 ISP Williams W55F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolee Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2022-12-03 · 8.0 ISP Williams W55F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Hauser
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-10-01 · 8.0 ISP Williams W55F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Hauser
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2022-04-10 · 8.0 ISP Williams W55S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathryn Daley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2022-04-06 · 8.0 PTC Stockdale W65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Mercier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-03-30 · 8.0 PTC Stockdale W65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Cox
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2022-03-02 · 8.0 PTC Stockdale W65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Roberta Snow
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 40.4% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 42.7% of games
8.0
24.4%
11W–34L · 39.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe