← Search

Dan Hostetler

Mulino, OR
0.0 year-end
37 matches · 20W–17L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Dan sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Dan is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams43 teams · 2001–2022
CHARB-Townsend
2022 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men
2022
CHARB-Ryan
2022 Adult 70 & Over · Men
2022
CHARB-Noll
2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2022
Charb-Moreno 7.0
2020 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2020
CHARB-Moreno
2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2020
CHARB-Townsend/Hostetler
2020 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men
2020
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Dan has gone from the 81st to the 40th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 65.7% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 45.2% of games
7.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.5% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history37 matches
L
Kenneth Baumgartner / Greg Fortierchamps
2022-09-15 · CHARB-Noll · #1 Doubles · with Gary McKenzie
−0.012below expectation — took 37% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Bruce Feldman / Jim Wellwood
2022-08-23 · CHARB-Ryan · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Gary McKenzie
−0.015about as expected — took 75% of games against 72% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Raymur Murray / Jim Collins
2022-08-11 · CHARB-Ryan · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Richard Springer
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-0
W
2022-08-04 · CHARB-Ryan · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Dennis Reed
−0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
James Howell / Jim Schembs
2022-07-29 · CHARB-Ryan · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Richard Springer
+0.040better than expected — took 92% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2022-07-20 · CHARB-Ryan · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Gary McKenzie
−0.036below expectation — took 33% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-06-02 · CHARB-Ryan · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Steven Ryan
−0.035below expectation — took 65% of games against 72% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2022-05-05 · CHARB-Townsend · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Ryan
−0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
Steven Christenson / Mark Hudspeth
2022-04-21 · CHARB-Townsend · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Reed
−0.001about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
3-4
W
2022-03-31 · CHARB-Townsend · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gene Schwartz
+0.016better than expected — took 60% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-03-24 · CHARB-Townsend · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gene Schwartz
−0.008below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Martin Jeffrey Binns / Michael Stone
2021-10-31 · CHARB-Noll · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Mills
−0.028below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.