Search

Jim Lekas

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
34 matches · 22W–12L · seasons 20192022
Where Jim sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Jim is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams34 teams · 2014–2025
MAC-Wright/Thomas
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men
2025
MAC-Lekas/Knox
2025 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men
2025
MAC-Lekas/Burczak
2024 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men
2024
N OR-MAC-Wright
2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2023
N OR-MAC-Lekas
2023 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men
2023
MAC-Wright/Eisen
2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jim has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 62.5% of games
7.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 58.2% of games
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history34 matches
W
Liz VanDerschelden / Reed Palmerchamps
2022-10-02 · MAC-Wright · #2 Doubles · with Holly Lekas
+0.015better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2022-06-12 · MAC-Wright · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Mileham
+0.045better than expected — took 92% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2022-05-29 · MAC-Wright (6.0) · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Lekas
+0.000below expectation — took 52% of games against 60% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2022-05-22 · MAC-Wright · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Meyer
+0.082better than expected — took 100% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2022-05-05 · MAC-Reykalin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Bayless
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2022-05-01 · MAC-Wright · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Bayless
+0.018better than expected — took 61% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-04-29 · MAC-Reykalin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Bayless
0.037below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2022-04-20 · MAC-Wright (6.0) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Lekas
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2022-03-31 · MAC-Reykalin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Bayless
0.051below expectation — took 59% of games against 74% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Bill Sturman / Bob McBride
2022-03-17 · MAC-Reykalin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Bayless
0.002about as expected — took 59% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2021-10-03 · MAC-Wright/Eisen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Zachary Wright
0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Michael Patrick / Ben Yamaguchi
2021-09-18 · MAC-Wright/Eisen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Bayless
0.056below expectation — took 47% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.