← Search

Robert Candelario

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Antioch, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 26W–23L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history49 matches
L
2026-02-18 · DIAMOND HILLS 40AM3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Nelson Tolentino
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-1
L
2025-04-09 · PINOLE PK 65AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig McAllister
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-01-25 · DIAMOND HILLS 40AM3.5B · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Reynolds
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-10-21 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0B · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Schmidt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-10-17 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bruce Koliha
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-09-04 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dale Lifson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2024-05-11 · DIAMOND HILLS 55AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Sullivan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-04-21 · DIAMOND HILLS 55AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eduardo Zerbini
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-09 · PINOLE PK 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Roth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-04-06 · DIAMOND HILLS 55AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Honaker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-03-28 · PINOLE PK 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ed Wong
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-03-27 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Katzman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 44.6% of games
6.0
71.4%
15W–6L · 61.9% of games
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.5% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer