← Search

Malinda Danielson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 17W–31L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history48 matches
L
2025-01-06 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Strohm
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-12-09 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tara Harper
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Zahorka
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2024-11-04 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Strohm
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathryn Whisman
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anne LaFever
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cynthia Perelli-Minetti
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindy Mullinax
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindy Mullinax
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2023-12-04 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adrienne Walker-Heller
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2023-11-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tara Harper
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-11-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lindy Mullinax
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2022–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 50.1% of games
4.5
0%
0W–5L · 18.9% of games
8.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer