← Search

Mario Quezada

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Jose, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 29W–31L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history60 matches
L
2025-05-21 · SILVER CREEK 55AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fernando Luque
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-18 · SILVER CREEK 55AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fernando Luque
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-05-06 · SILVER CREEK 55AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fernando Luque
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-05-05 · SILVER CREEK 55AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Alexander
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-03 · SILVER CREEK 55AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Stebbins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-04-25 · SILVER CREEK 55AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Raymond Lee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-7
L
2025-04-17 · SILVER CREEK 55AM8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rick Pittenger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-04-09 · SILVER CREEK 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Han
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2024-10-01 · SILVER CREEK CM7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Hao
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-05-26 · ALMADEN VAC 55AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Stebbins
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-05-19 · ALMADEN VAC 55AM8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alan Kirchick
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2024-05-01 · ALMADEN VAC 55AM8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Stebbins
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
54.5%
18W–15L · 51% of games
7.0
60%
6W–4L · 52.3% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.6% of games
8.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal