← Search

Kim Kelly

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BLUFFTON, SC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 106W–64L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history170 matches
W
2026-10-25 · HHTL55/Fitch/Vander Berg/Shipyard · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tammy Winslow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-23 · HHTL55/Fitch/Vander Berg/Shipyard · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Monahan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-19 · HHTL40/Archibald/PRRC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cynthia Duvall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-13 · HHTL40/Archibald/PRRC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lydia Vaughan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · HHTL40/Archibald/PRRC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anne Brooks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-16 · HHTL40/Archibald/PRRC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Willow Cooper
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · HHTL40/Archibald/PRRC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ashley Gregor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-25 · HHTL40/Archibald/PRRC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ashley Gregor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-12 · HHTL40/Pollitzer/Port Royal · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Donna Bierschenk
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · HHTL40/Pollitzer/Port Royal · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacie Hunt
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-22 · HHTL40/Pollitzer/Port Royal · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacie Hunt
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-18 · HHTL55/Archibald/Port Royal · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stacie Hunt
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 55.8% of games
3.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.2% of games
4.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 61.7% of games
4.5
51.2%
21W–20L · 49.5% of games
7.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 64.6% of games
8.5
54.5%
24W–20L · 53.8% of games
9.0
60%
15W–10L · 55.7% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.5% of games
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
37 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe