← Search

Donna Bierschenk

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bluffton, SC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 127W–48L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history175 matches
W
2026-10-24 · HHTL55/Fitch/Vander Berg/Shipyard · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Monahan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-23 · HHTL55/Fitch/Vander Berg/Shipyard · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Margaret Deutsch
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
Default
2026-10-04 · HHTL40/Castricone/PRRC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Deanna Childers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-13 · HHTL40/Castricone/PRRC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Montanez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-04 · HHTL40/Castricone/PRRC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jan O'Neill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · HHTL40/Castricone/PRRC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Terry Sargent
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · HHTL40/Castricone/PRRC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Deanna Childers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-15 · HHTL40/Castricone/PRRC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Pamela Bautista
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-25 · HHTL40/Castricone/PRRC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Terry Sargent
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · HHTL40/Castricone/PRRC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Pamela Bautista
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · HHTL40/Pollitzer/Port Royal · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Kinnear
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-12 · HHTL40/Pollitzer/Port Royal · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Kelly
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.7% of games
4.5
62.5%
35W–21L · 52.5% of games
8.5
77.2%
44W–13L · 59.4% of games
9.0
65.5%
19W–10L · 58.1% of games
4.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 69% of games
9.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 60.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
28 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer