← Search

Richard Atterbury

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Windsor Heights, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 5W–13L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history18 matches
W
2026-01-17 · IA/Jha-Hanson/40&Over4.0M · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Hanson
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-01-03 · IA/Jha-Hanson/40&Over4.0M · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Huneke
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-12-06 · IA/Jha-Hanson/40&Over4.0M · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Bohnenkamp
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-21 · IA/Pitzen/65&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph McAdams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-03-07 · Shortenhaus/Pitzen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cliff Stroh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-02 · Shortenhaus/Pitzen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cliff Stroh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-01-10 · Shortenhaus/Pitzen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Pitzen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2024-11-01 · Shortenhaus/Pitzen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cliff Stroh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
L
2024-06-22 · IAWC/Pitzen/65&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Bohnenkamp
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-01-07 · Pitzen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cliff Stroh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2023-10-29 · Pitzen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-03 · Pitzen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cliff Stroh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 30.6% of games
8.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
17%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams