← Search

Lindsey Keeler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Waltham, MA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
282 matches · 211W–71L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history282 matches
W
2026-05-30 · WOB:Fault Lines:Slavsky/Ericson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrea Martello mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-05-28 · WESB:Westboro:Waung/Zatsiorsky · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Janel Bhattacharya
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-21 · WESB:Westboro:Waung/Zatsiorsky · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with June Biner
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-17 · WOB:Fault Lines:Slavsky/Ericson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eugene Slavsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-22 · WTC:Winchester:Jimenez · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mason Keel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-20 · WOB:Fault Lines:Slavsky/Ericson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter DeBarros mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
Morgan Ludwig / Mike Bortnick
2026-03-01 · First Serve · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Rahul Bakshi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7
L
2026-02-22 · WTC:Winchester:Jimenez · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dan Spero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-06 · WOB:Fault Lines:Slavsky/Ericson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter DeBarros mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-07-24 · WESB:Westboro:Waung/Lo · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Janel Bhattacharya
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-5
L
2025-06-14 · WESB:Westboro:Waung/Lo · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cassy Waung
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-05-29 · WESB:Westboro:Waung/Lo · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Holly Bogo
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams94 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level16 levels played
3.5
80%
20W–5L · 62.8% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
77.6%
52W–15L · 61% of games
5.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.4% of games
9.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.8% of games
0.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.2% of games
3.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 68.9% of games
4.5mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 58.4% of games
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80.9%
38W–9L · 61.7% of games
8.5mixed
100%
13W–0L · 73.4% of games
9.0mixed
63.9%
39W–22L · 56.1% of games
9.5mixed
50%
5W–5L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
149 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
43 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova