← Search

Lisa Phelps

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmington, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
270 matches · 153W–117L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history270 matches
L
2026-10-06 · Phelps · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-01 · Phelps · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-30 · Atterbury 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Diana Rode
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-27 · Phelps · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-26 · Atterbury 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Diana Rode
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-2
W
2026-09-23 · Knight · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hope Conway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-22 · Phelps · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ashley Doyle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-14 · Knight · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hope Conway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-09 · Knight · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hope Conway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-02 · Atterbury 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Sottung
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · Atterbury 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Sottung
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-01 · Phelps · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Megan Atterbury
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
85.3%
58W–10L · 62.4% of games
4.5
19.6%
9W–37L · 41.5% of games
8.5
64.4%
47W–26L · 54% of games
9.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 49.4% of games
4.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 56.8% of games
4.5mixed
0%
0W–13L · 30% of games
8.0mixed
59.5%
25W–17L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
113 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
61 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe