← Search

Virginia Nisson

Henderson, NV
4.5S year-end 2026
181 matches · 119W–62L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.99
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
53%
down to 4.0
47%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 32% down · 68% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.04. Higher than today’s 3.99 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 4.5
8 of 16
NV · 4.5
38 of 61

Virginia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Virginia has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.5201920202021202220232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Virginia has gone from the 37th to the 1st percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
74.5%
76W–26L · 56.5% of games
4.5
45.1%
23W–28L · 48.2% of games
8.0
100%
8W–0L · 59.7% of games
9.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history181 matches
L
Karin Fuire / Tricia Miller
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mae Loftus
−0.030below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Elisabeth Golden / Nicola Wien
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sofia Nuno
−0.072below expectation — took 20% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carri Geer-Thevenot
−0.059below expectation — took 14% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Elisabeth Golden / Mary Lynn Weber
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lynn Kellogg
−0.071below expectation — took 33% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Peggy Wu / Kim Haines
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie Gallant
−0.025below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Mary Lynn Weber / Therese Basham
2023-11-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carri Geer-Thevenot
−0.017below expectation — took 46% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
Christine Blake / Ui Afualo
2023-11-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carri Geer-Thevenot
−0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Christa Casper / Rachel Calderon Young
2023-10-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Haines
+0.023better than expected — took 57% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Virginia Kirkendall / Caroline Lee
2023-10-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Monique Richards
+0.001about as expected — took 38% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 4-2
L
2023-10-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Fust
+0.013about as expected — took 44% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-09-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carri Geer-Thevenot
+0.048better than expected — took 100% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Kathy Brashear / Mila Woodchamps
2023-09-09 · #1 Doubles · with Monique Richards
+0.075better than expected — took 45% of games against 29% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.