← Search

Luke Odegaard

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lake Elmo, MN
— year-end
35 matches · 23W–12L · seasons 2018–2021
Match history35 matches
W
2020-03-04 · Ciccarelli-Voges LTF-WBL · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Odegaard
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2020-02-26 · Ciccarelli-Voges LTF-WBL · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Odegaard
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2020-02-19 · Ciccarelli-Voges LTF-WBL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Dineen
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2020-02-05 · Ciccarelli-Voges LTF-WBL · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Odegaard
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2020-01-29 · Ciccarelli-Voges LTF-WBL · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Odegaard
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2020-01-15 · Ciccarelli-Voges LTF-WBL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Odegaard
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
W
2020-01-08 · Ciccarelli-Voges LTF-WBL · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Odegaard
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2019-12-18 · Ciccarelli-Voges LTF-WBL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Dineen
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2019-12-11 · Ciccarelli-Voges LTF-WBL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Davis Flanagan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2019-12-04 · Ciccarelli-Voges LTF-WBL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Narr
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2019-11-13 · Ciccarelli-Voges LTF-WBL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Davis Flanagan
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2019-10-30 · Ciccarelli-Voges LTF-WBL · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Ciccarelli
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Teams5 teams · 2019–2020
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
4.5
65.7%
23W–12L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
10 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer