← Search

Tina Moss

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Suffern, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 13W–33L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history46 matches
L
2026-06-08 · Matchpoint - 65+ 7.0 W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with April Leblang
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-08-04 · Matchpoint Tennis Club 65 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phyllis David
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-07-16 · Matchpoint Players 55 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annette James
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-07 · Matchpoint Tennis Club 65 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phyllis David
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-02 · Matchpoint Tennis Club 65 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Dietrich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-12 · Matchpoint · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phyllis David
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-7
L
2024-06-17 · Matchpoint · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia King
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-03 · Matchpoint · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Ames
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-0, 0-0
L
2023-08-01 · Matchpoint Players · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurette Klein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2023-07-18 · Matchpoint Players · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marlene Portnoy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
L
2022-08-11 · Match Point: You've Been Served · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katie Neuman
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2022-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cecily Gottling
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
18.5%
5W–22L · 39.6% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal