← Search

Lee Ann Pugh

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gulf Breeze, FL
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
33 matches · 3W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history33 matches
L
2026-05-06 · Tan - SHL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dodi Stringfellow
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-22 · Tan - SHL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Hutson
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-25 · Tan - SHL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wanda Chapman
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-11 · Tan - SHL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackie Barclay
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2022-11-12 · Chapman - SHL · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jackie Barclay
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2022-11-05 · Chapman - SHL · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tracy Ezelle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
L
2022-10-22 · Chapman - SHL · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Yuri Stibolt
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2022-07-18 · Chapman - SHL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Crump
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2022-07-06 · Chapman - SHL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Van Hughes
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2022-06-15 · Chapman - SHL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackie Barclay
loading the estimate
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2022-05-25 · Chapman - SHL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Madison
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-05-18 · Chapman - SHL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Harrison
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
8.3%
2W–22L · 31.3% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer