← Search

Nancy Dankle

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Champaign, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 9W–7L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history16 matches
L
2025-07-17 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Watson-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Soderlind
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-06-05 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Watson-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Ottemann
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-29 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Watson-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marla Golden
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-05-08 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Watson-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela ZuHone
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2022-07-05 · MSIL 3.5W A18&O Butterfield/Ottemann-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynnette Dodds
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-28 · MSIL 3.5W A18&O Butterfield/Ottemann-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Reardanz
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2022-06-21 · MSIL 3.5W A18&O Butterfield/Ottemann-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Cox
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2021-07-13 · MSIL 3.5W A18&O Butterfield/Ottemann-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Cox
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
L
2021-06-29 · MSIL 3.5W A18&O Butterfield/Ottemann-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Knight
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2021-06-08 · MSIL 3.5W A18&O Butterfield/Ottemann-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Knight
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2021-06-08 · MSIL 3.5W A18&O Butterfield/Ottemann-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Knight
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2021-05-25 · MSIL 3.5W A18&O Butterfield/Ottemann-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Cox
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
3.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer