← Search

Eva Migacz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bonita Springs, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 28W–35L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history63 matches
L
2026-05-26 · Audubon / C. Bresson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Olek
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-06 · Audubon / C. Bresson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Davis
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-22 · Audubon / C. Bresson · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ulla Wolff
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · Audubon / C. Bresson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Yagoda
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-23 · 2ND Pl.Fall/Valencia Bonita / Prochilo · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glenda Stein championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-12-14 · 2ND Pl.Fall/Valencia Bonita / Prochilo · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roberta Lewis championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-08 · 2ND Pl.Fall/Valencia Bonita / Prochilo · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Doran
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2025-12-01 · 2ND Pl.Fall/Valencia Bonita / Prochilo · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roberta Lewis
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-24 · 2ND Pl.Fall/Valencia Bonita / Prochilo · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roberta Lewis
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-11-17 · 2ND Pl.Fall/Valencia Bonita / Prochilo · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Reynolds
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-11-12 · Flight Z Winners/Valencia Bonita / Steuerer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Doran
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-27 · 2ND Pl.Fall/Valencia Bonita / Prochilo · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Reynolds
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 35.5% of games
6.0
53.3%
16W–14L · 51.2% of games
6.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 58% of games
7.0
12.5%
2W–14L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer