← Search

Ilene Flack

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naples, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 46W–59L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history105 matches
L
2026-02-23 · Sterling Oaks/ Globerman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Johnston
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-09 · Sterling Oaks/ Globerman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Johnston
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-26 · Sterling Oaks/ Globerman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Camille Globerman
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-19 · Sterling Oaks/ Globerman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Johnston
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-01-12 · Sterling Oaks/ Globerman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Johnston
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-11-24 · Naples YMCA / Correa · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Oroho
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
W
2025-11-17 · Naples YMCA / Correa · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Ginzburg
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-03 · Naples YMCA / Correa · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Mattke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-13 · Sterling Oaks / Globerman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beverly Graham
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-04 · Sterling Oaks / Globerman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beverly Graham
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-03-03 · Sterling Oaks / Globerman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beverly Graham
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-02-17 · Sterling Oaks / Globerman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beverly Graham
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
49.3%
36W–37L · 48.8% of games
7.5
40%
6W–9L · 45.9% of games
8.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 38.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams