← Search

Amanda Pigue

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 48W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history125 matches
L
2026-09-25 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melinda Claudepierre
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-18 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melinda Claudepierre
loading the estimate
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-14 · INVERNESS - DOUGLAS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally McClanahan
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-11 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melinda Claudepierre
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrea Rudder
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-10 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Vines
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-05 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Kozlowski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bonnie Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Sandidge
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-1
W
2026-07-01 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauri Derecki
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally McClanahan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-02 · Inverness CC - McClanahan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally McClanahan
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
43.2%
38W–50L · 47.8% of games
7.5
27%
10W–27L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
41 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer