← Search

Ariane Qureshi

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New York, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 40W–84L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history124 matches
L
2025-10-01 · Welles/Gould · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Gould
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-27 · Rowe/Chee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Jane Reisinger
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4
L
2025-03-14 · Rowe/Chee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Jane Reisinger
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-07 · Rowe/Chee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eva Lesniak
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-01-12 · Rowe/Chee · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Bricker
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-06 · Rowe/Chee · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Halina Pavels
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-05-07 · Rowe/Chee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leonila Jewell
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-6
L
2024-04-29 · Rowe/Chee · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Inaya Awar
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-02 · Rowe/Chee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leonila Jewell
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-03-06 · Welles/Gould · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorri Ahl
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-03-05 · Rowe/Chee · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Halina Pavels
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2024-02-12 · Welles/Gould · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deirdre Coll
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2025
Rowe/Chee
2025 40&Over Women · 3.5 Women · 40+
2025
Welles/Gould
2025 18&Over Non-Advancing · 3.5 Women Day League Fall · 18+
2025
Rowe/Chee
2024 40&Over Women · 3.5 Women · 40+
2024
Welles/Gould
2024 Women's Day League · 3.5
2024
Rathore
2023 18&Over Non-Advancing · 3.5 Women's Day League - Winter · 18+
2023
Rathore
2023 18&Over Non-Advancing · 3.5 Women's Day League - Spring · 18+
2023
Rowe/Chee
2023 40&Over Women · 3.5 Women · 40+
2023
Rowe/Qureshi-D2
2023 18&Over Women Manhattan · 3.5 Women · 18+
2023
Manhattan: Rowe/Qureshi - D2
2022 18&Over Women Manhattan · 3.5 Women · 18+
2022
Bindler/Rowe
2021 18&Over Mixed Manhattan · 7.0 Mixed · 18+
2021
Bindler/Rowe
2021 18&Over Mixed Queens · 7.0 Mixed · 18+
2021
Bindler/Rowe
2021 40&Over Mixed · 7.0 · 40+
2021
Eichenbaum/Rodriguez
2021 Tri-Level Metro · 4.5 Women
2021
Ford/Bricker
2021 18&Over Women Queens · 4.0 · 18+
2021
Ford/Bricker
2021 18 & Over Women Manhattan · 4.0 Women · 18+
2021
Ford/Bricker
2021 40&Over Women · 4.0 Women · 40+
2021
Rowe
2021 18&Over Women Queens · 3.5 · 18+
2021
Rowe/Chee
2021 40&Over Women · 3.5 Women · 40+
2021
Rowe/Qureshi D2
2021 18&Over Women Manhattan · 3.5 Women · 18+
2021
Bindler - A
2020 18&Over Mixed Queens · 7.0 Mixed · 18+
2020
Pavels
2020 40&Over Women · 4.0 Women · 40+
2020
Rowe/Chee
2020 40&Over Women · 3.5 Women · 40+
2020
Rowe/Qureshi
New 2020 18&Over Women Queens · 3.5 Women · 18+
2020
Ashley Rowe Div B
2019 18&Over Mixed Queens · 7.0 Mixed · 18+
2019
Bronx: Bordick/Rodriguez
2019 18&Over Mixed Bronx · 7.0 Mixed · 18+
2019
Metro: Rowe/Chee
2019 40&Over Women · 3.5 Women · 40+
2019
Pavels
2019 18&Over Women Queens · 4.0 · 18+
2019
Pavels
2019 18&Over Women Manhattan · 4.0 Women · 18+
2019
Pavels/Bailey - Division B
2019 40&Over Women · 4.0 Women · 40+
2019
Rowe
2019 18&Over Mixed Manhattan · 7.0 Mixed · 18+
2019
Rowe
2019 18&Over Women Queens · 3.5 · 18+
2019
Rowe/Qureshi
2019 18&Over Women Manhattan · 3.5 Women · 18+
2019
Vogt/Kende
2019 18&Over Mixed Manhattan · 8.0 Mixed · 18+
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
39.7%
29W–44L · 45.6% of games
4.0
16%
4W–21L · 36.5% of games
7.0mixed
26.1%
6W–17L · 43.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
36 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova