← Search

Rosemary Prola

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Columbia, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 44W–75L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history119 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Monroe - Tootsie Pops · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslie MacFarlane
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · Monroe - Tootsie Pops · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslie MacFarlane
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-6
L
2026-06-09 · Monroe - Tootsie Pops · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Brown
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-01 · Monroe - Tootsie Pops · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Goldy
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-28 · Jordan 65+ 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Engler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-12 · Jordan 65+ 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terri Mrozinski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-6
W
2025-06-11 · Jordan 65+ 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Dolinka
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-05-28 · Jordan 65+ 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Long
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2024-08-06 · Shipley · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Trish Shipley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-08-05 · Shipley · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vickie Carroll
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-31 · Shipley · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Barall
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-28 · Shipley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Murray
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 77.8% of games
3.5
39.2%
20W–31L · 45% of games
7.0
30.6%
19W–43L · 41.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
40%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams