← Search

Jackie Livesay

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Phoenix, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
256 matches · 109W–147L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history256 matches
W
2026-08-10 · 6.5 PTC Prickly Pairs WMonPM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristy McCool
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-27 · 6.5 PTC Prickly Pairs WMonPM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristy McCool
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · 6.5 PTC Prickly Pairs WMonPM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristy Morris
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-06 · 6.5 PTC Prickly Pairs WMonPM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristy Morris
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · 6.5 PTC Prickly Pairs WMonPM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Austin
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-01 · 3.5 PTC Zimmer/Brauer W40S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Stone
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-25 · 3.5 PTC Zimmer/Brauer W40S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Brauer
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-18 · 3.5 PTC Zimmer/Brauer W40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Stone
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-11 · 3.5 PTC Zimmer/Brauer W40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tevia Wall
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-11-16 · Chip N Charge · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Ganney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-25 · Chip N Charge · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donald Fishman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-07 · EN FUN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ursulla McLeod
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 45.7% of games
3.5
50%
11W–11L · 51.8% of games
4.0
28.4%
21W–53L · 40.4% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 60.5% of games
7.0
74.3%
26W–9L · 56.1% of games
7.5
46.2%
12W–14L · 50.1% of games
8.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 40.8% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
36.4%
8W–14L · 44.6% of games
7.5mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 52.3% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
6W–15L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
114 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
50 matches
#1 Female Doubles
0%
1 match
#3 Female Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams