← Search

Matthew Homan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
WAXHAW, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 14W–15L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history29 matches
L
2026-09-19 · JSmith/Nichols (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Dougherty championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-18 · JSmith/Nichols (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Nakayama championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-17 · JSmith/Nichols (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Nakayama championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · JSmith/Nichols (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tom Shober
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · JSmith/Nichols (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michael Dougherty
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · JSmith/Nichols (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tom Shober
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · JSmith/Nichols (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tom Shober
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-29 · JSemones (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Philip Marxen
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-04-08 · JSemones (OPRC) · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-18 · JSemones (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John England
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2023-07-24 · KVerrill (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Allison Homan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-23 · KVerrill (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Allison Homan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 64.2% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
40%
4W–6L · 48.9% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.2% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 54.5% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
5 matches
#1 Singles
10%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova