← Search

Jared Kleber

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 34W–36L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jared Kleber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-09-07 · JMorse (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Will Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-31 · JMorse (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Will Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-26 · JMorse (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Luke Deangelis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · JMorse (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ryan Morse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-22 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Helman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-01 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Barden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
Daniel Adams
2026-06-13 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · JMorse/MYin (Charlotte Tennis) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · JMorse/MYin (Charlotte Tennis) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-15 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Blandford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-08 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Dillon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 64.8% of games
3.5
24.1%
7W–22L · 42% of games
6.5
75%
9W–3L · 60.1% of games
7.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.4% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
12 matches
#2 Singles
13%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal