← Search

Stephanie Foley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ave Maria, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
231 matches · 146W–85L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history231 matches
L
2026-10-29 · Glen Eagle / Newhall · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Jhanji
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-24 · Riverstone / Marchand · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Benjamin Stevens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-10-19 · Glen Eagle / Newhall · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cynthia George
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-17 · Riverstone / Marchand · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Benjamin Stevens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-23 · COLLIER/Marchand · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Benjamin Stevens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Default
2026-05-17 · COLLIER/Marchand · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Benjamin Stevens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-14 · Glen Eagle / Newhall · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tara Newhall
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-03 · COLLIER/Marchand · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Benjamin Stevens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-26 · Glen Eagle / Newhall · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cynthia George
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-26 · Winter Winners/Glen Eagle / Newhall · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sonia Denoncourt
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-19 · Winter Winners/Glen Eagle / Newhall · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sonia Denoncourt
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-16 · Olde Cypress / Maurer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracy Maurer
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 44.9% of games
4.0
80%
44W–11L · 64.7% of games
4.5
42.9%
39W–52L · 48.9% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
85.4%
41W–7L · 64.5% of games
9.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
134 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
27 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer