← Search

Allison Mac Ewan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Burbank, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 42W–74L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history116 matches
L
2026-02-07 · Simply Smashing/MacEwan-Scott/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Scott
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-01 · Simply Smashing 7.0/Galaviz/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Riley Klarkowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-24 · Simply Smashing/MacEwan-Scott/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Scott
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-18 · Simply Smashing/MacEwan-Scott/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Scott
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-01-17 · Simply Smashing 3.5/MacEwan/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Scott
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-11 · Simply Smashing 3.5/MacEwan/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Thompson
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-07 · SFV-Simply Smashing/MacEwan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Scott
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-12-06 · SFV-Simply Smashing/MacEwan · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bethany Nelson
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-11-30 · SFV-Burbank TC/MacEwan & Makadsi · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Riley Klarkowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-5
L
2025-11-23 · SFV-Simply Smashing/MacEwan · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Kennedy
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-22 · SFV-Simply Smashing/MacEwan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Scott
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-09 · SFV-Burbank TC/MacEwan & Makadsi · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Riley Klarkowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
41.2%
35W–50L · 50% of games
3.5
11.1%
2W–16L · 30.6% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer