← Search

Natalie Garrett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
402 matches · 144W–258L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history402 matches
L
2026-10-26 · LCTA40/Singer/Dunes West · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Mears
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-10-19 · LCTA40/Singer/Dunes West · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Meszaros
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-13 · LCTA54/WIGGINS/MPR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Donahue
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-09-28 · LCTA40/Singer/Dunes West · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Stanton
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-26 · LCTA54/WIGGINS/MPR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Goforth
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-19 · #2 Doubles · with Elaine Herbst
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-18 · #2 Doubles · with Elaine Herbst
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-18 · #2 Doubles · with Janet Winch
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-30 · LCTA40/Smith/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hongye Yang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-12 · LCTA40/Smith/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pierre Leblanc mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7
W
2026-06-06 · LCTA55/Mahoney/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Lazo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-03 · LCTA40/Smith/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Morris Cooke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams84 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
47.9%
68W–74L · 49% of games
4.0
14.5%
11W–65L · 35.6% of games
6.5
29%
9W–22L · 43.6% of games
7.5
38.2%
21W–34L · 43.2% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 47.7% of games
4.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.6% of games
7.0mixed
58.8%
20W–14L · 53.5% of games
8.0mixed
16.2%
6W–31L · 37.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
121 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
89 matches
#1 Singles
14%
55 matches
#2 Singles
9%
35 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova