← Search

Linda Woodland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Scottsdale, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 4W–25L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history29 matches
W
2026-10-24 · 3.5 DMC1 Desert Mountain W55F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Silberg
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-10 · 3.5 DMC1 Desert Mountain W55F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcie Rittler
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-26 · 3.5 DMC1 Desert Mountain W55F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcie Rittler
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-10 · 7.0 DMCC Desert Mountain W55F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Henninger
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-03 · 7.0 DMCC Desert Mountain W55F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Levy
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-11-08 · 7.0 DMCC Desert Mountain W55F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Lochead
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-01 · 7.0 DMCC Desert Mountain W55F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Lochead
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-10-11 · 7.0 DMCC Desert Mountain W55F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Brinker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-04 · 7.0 DMCC Desert Mountain W55F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Brinker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-03-03 · 4.0 Desert Mountain W18SD · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Petersen
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2023-02-24 · 4.0 Desert Mountain W18SD · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Petersen
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2023-02-18 · 8.0 Desert Mountain W55S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Stein
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
16.7%
3W–15L · 37.4% of games
7.0
0%
0W–6L · 34% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova