← Search

Carmen Lavergne

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baton Rouge, LA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
310 matches · 190W–120L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history310 matches
W
2026-10-28 · Searcy/18/3.5/WD/BOC · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Ashley Frey
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-10-27 · Rosenfeld/18/3.5/WN/UClub · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine McKegney
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-21 · Searcy/18/3.5/WD/BOC · #4 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Monique Carmouche
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-14 · Searcy/18/3.5/WD/BOC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Mladenka
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-10-13 · Rosenfeld/18/3.5/WN/UClub · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Dianne Bourgeois
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-10-07 · Rosenfeld/40/CWN/UCLUB · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catherine Rosenfeld
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-05 · Rosenfeld/18/65/CWN/UCLUB · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catherine Rosenfeld
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-30 · Rosenfeld/40/CWN/UCLUB · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catherine Rosenfeld
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-30 · Searcy/18/3.5/WD/BOC · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Monique Carmouche
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-21 · Rosenfeld/18/65/CWN/UCLUB · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patricia McCann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-16 · Rosenfeld/40/CWN/UCLUB · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dianne Bourgeois
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-09 · Rosenfeld/40/CWN/UCLUB · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dianne Bourgeois
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams108 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
72.1%
101W–39L · 59.8% of games
3.5
59.7%
40W–27L · 51.5% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
48.8%
42W–44L · 50.5% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 59% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 41.3% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
118 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
92 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
89 matches
#3 Female Doubles
1%
4 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova