← Search

Catherine Rosenfeld

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baton Rouge, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
318 matches · 202W–116L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history318 matches
L
2026-10-27 · Rosenfeld/18/3.5/WN/UClub · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Lyles
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-26 · Guarisco/55/3.0/WD/UC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine McKegney
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-20 · Wicker/55/3.0/WN/BREC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Mclindon
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-10-07 · Rosenfeld/40/CWN/UCLUB · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carmen Lavergne
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-06 · Rosenfeld/18/3.5/WN/UClub · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Stott
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-05 · Rosenfeld/18/65/CWN/UCLUB · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carmen Lavergne
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-01 · Rosenfeld/18/3.0/WN/UCLUB · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Dianne Bourgeois
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-30 · Rosenfeld/40/CWN/UCLUB · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carmen Lavergne
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-29 · Wicker/55/3.0/WN/BREC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela DeJean
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-28 · Rosenfeld/18/65/CWN/UCLUB · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Lacassin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-24 · Rosenfeld/18/3.0/WN/UCLUB · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Sebastian Ashton
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-23 · Rosenfeld/40/CWN/UCLUB · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams90 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
78.6%
22W–6L · 60.6% of games
3.0
65.1%
97W–52L · 55.6% of games
3.5
35%
7W–13L · 40.4% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 58.2% of games
6.5
59.6%
31W–21L · 52.6% of games
3.0mixed
100%
10W–0L · 64.8% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 25.4% of games
6.0mixed
68.6%
24W–11L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
121 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
80 matches
#2 Singles
3%
10 matches
#1 Singles
2%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams