← Search

Julie LeBlanc

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BATON ROUGE, LA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 99W–74L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history173 matches
W
2026-10-12 · Chenevert/40/6.5/CWD/BREC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lacey Callegan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-07 · Pearson/40/6.5/CWN/Legacy · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracye Russo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-06 · LeBlanc/18/3.5/WN/BREC · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Lacey Callegan
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-02 · Rubio/18/6.5/CWD/BREC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Castellanos
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-10-01 · Rubio/18/6.5/CWD/BREC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lacey Callegan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-30 · Pearson/40/6.5/CWN/Legacy · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lacey Callegan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-29 · LeBlanc/18/3.5/WN/BREC · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Lacey Callegan
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-28 · Callegan/18/6.5/CWN/BREC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Danielle Pearson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-09-28 · Chenevert/40/6.5/CWD/BREC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Rubio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-23 · Pearson/40/6.5/CWN/Legacy · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Akins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-09-22 · LeBlanc/18/3.5/WN/BREC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Lacey Callegan
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-09-21 · Callegan/18/6.5/CWN/BREC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lacey Callegan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
60%
9W–6L · 53.2% of games
3.0
74.4%
29W–10L · 61.9% of games
3.5
38.5%
15W–24L · 46.7% of games
5.5
66.7%
18W–9L · 57.7% of games
6.5
47.1%
16W–18L · 47.9% of games
2.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.2% of games
3.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.5% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
43 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#3 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert