← Search

Lauren Gleason

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baton Rouge, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 26W–25L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history51 matches
L
2026-10-20 · G. Smith/18/3.5/WN/Bocage · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Kindler
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-02 · Price/18/6.5/CWD/BOC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hannah Wallace
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-29 · G. Smith/18/3.5/WN/Bocage · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Kindler
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-22 · G. Smith/18/3.5/WN/Bocage · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Kindler
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-18 · Price/18/6.5/CWD/BOC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aly Thames
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-09-17 · Sivils/18/3.0/WN/BOC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal LoBue
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · Padial/18/Div2/WD/BREC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Williams championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-01 · G. Smith/18/3.5/WN/Bocage · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Calli Sivils
loading the estimate
6-0, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-25 · G. Smith/18/3.5/WN/Bocage · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Taylor
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · Price/18/6.5/CWD/BOC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hannah Wallace
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · Price/18/6.5/CWD/BOC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hannah Wallace
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-10 · Padial/18/Div2/WD/BREC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Padial
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
56.2%
18W–14L · 55.5% of games
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 44.7% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.5% of games
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
13 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
2 matches
#3 Female Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert