← Search

Betty Treanor

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baton Rouge, LA
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
47 matches · 39W–8L · seasons 2026–2026
Match history47 matches
W
2026-10-29 · Holeman/18/3.0/WN/BREC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Charlotte Smith
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-10-27 · Neames/18/3.5/WN/CCLA · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Talbot
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-20 · Neames/18/3.5/WN/CCLA · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Cherie Favaro
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
Lisa Perry / Megan Harrell
2026-10-15 · Holeman/18/3.0/WN/BREC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Wismans
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-13 · Neames/18/3.5/WN/CCLA · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelli St Romain
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-09 · Holeman/18/3.0/WN/BREC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Wismans
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-08 · Holeman/18/3.0/WN/BREC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Autumn Armentor
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-07 · CSmith/40/6.5/CWN/CCL · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cherie Favaro
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-05 · Holeman/40/5.5/CWN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rachael Blake
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-30 · CSmith/40/6.5/CWN/CCL · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cherie Favaro
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-09-29 · Neames/18/3.5/WN/CCLA · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Marsha Jumonville
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-28 · Holeman/40/5.5/CWN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rachael Blake
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
89.5%
17W–2L · 66.2% of games
3.5
80%
8W–2L · 60.7% of games
5.5
100%
5W–0L · 67.9% of games
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.9% of games
3.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#1 Female Doubles
11%
5 matches
#2 Female Doubles
9%
4 matches
#3 Female Doubles
6%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova