← Search

David Raatz

WAILUKU, HI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
215 matches · 103W–112L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Raatz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history215 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Wells Doubles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lore Lee Robello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-29 · Wells Doubles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Trudi Vierra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-26 · Wells Gang · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Chaves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · Wells Gang · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Chaves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-26 · Wells Gang · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lore Lee Robello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · Wells Gang · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lore Lee Robello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Mike's 3.5 #3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Bettendorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Ron Rogers / Courtney Mendell
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Clarita Balala championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Clarita Balala championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-16 · Mike's 3.5 #3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wayne Feike
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-07 · Mike's 3.5 #3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wayne Feike
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · Mike's 3.5 #3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan McFarland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
40.8%
31W–45L · 46.5% of games
7.0
51.4%
18W–17L · 52.5% of games
7.0mixed
64%
48W–27L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
32 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
7%
16 matches
#1 Male Doubles
7%
14 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams