← Search

Nathan McFarland

Haiku, HI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 63W–24L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Nathan McFarland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
L
2026-08-08 · Mike 7.0-1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Kanahele mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-06 · Mike 7.0-1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erika Varcak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · Mike 7.0-1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Kanahele mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-21 · Mike's 3.5 #3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dave Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Dan Schweitzer / Cynthia Real
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Shannon Sayles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Shannon Sayles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Jill Kanahele championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-2
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Heidi Thorson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Shannon Sayles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Ron Rogers / Courtney Mendell
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Jill Kanahele championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-06 · Mike's 3.5 #3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Raatz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-25 · #4 Doubles · with Jonathan Yudis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-8
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
70%
14W–6L · 59.2% of games
6.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 67.8% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.3% of games
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 71.5% of games
7.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#1 Male Doubles
17%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
9 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
9%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert