← Search

Jonathan Yudis

Kula, HI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 103W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jonathan Yudis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history188 matches
L
2026-08-02 · MCC Hawaiian Hustle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gina Teliho mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · MCC Hawaiian Hustle · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natalie Plotkin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-07-11 · MCC Hawaiian Hustle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natalie Plotkin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-21 · Mike's 3.5 #3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Keirnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-20 · Mike's 3.5 #3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Keirnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-16 · Mike's 3.5 #3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Bettendorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-06 · Mike's 3.5 #3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Keirnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · Mike's 3.5 #3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Raatz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-25 · #4 Doubles · with Nathan McFarland championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-8
L
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · with Tom Keirnes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-9
L
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · with Tom Keirnes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-8
L
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · with Tom Keirnes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-8
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
78.8%
41W–11L · 60.9% of games
4.0
32.6%
14W–29L · 44.1% of games
7.0
64.3%
18W–10L · 56.1% of games
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.5% of games
7.0mixed
73.3%
22W–8L · 63.1% of games
8.0mixed
8.3%
1W–11L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
37 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
11%
20 matches
#1 Male Doubles
8%
15 matches
#1 Singles
6%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams