← Search

Angela Horn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
WHITEHOUSE, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
272 matches · 200W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history272 matches
W
2026-11-01 · NWO 6.5W Combo Bastas/Gottschalk-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda Pwono
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-25 · NWO 6.5W Combo Bastas/Gottschalk-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda Pwono
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-10-11 · NWO 6.5W Combo Bastas/Gottschalk-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Madison Pettry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Herrick championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Szczechowski-AW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Graff
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Kirby/Gottschalk-FT · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsie Hoagland
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Szczechowski-AW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Sturt
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Kirby/Gottschalk-FT · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mia Rettig
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Szczechowski-AW · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Graff
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Kirby/Gottschalk-FT · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Herrick
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-07 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Szczechowski-AW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Graff
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Szczechowski-AW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Graff
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.2% of games
3.5
76.6%
108W–33L · 58.9% of games
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 50.5% of games
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 63.3% of games
7.5
74.5%
35W–12L · 58.2% of games
7.0mixed
78.3%
36W–10L · 61.1% of games
8.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 68% of the time
#1 Doubles
68%
186 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
31 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert