← Search

Kirk Robeson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Canton, OH
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 22W–3L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history25 matches
W
2026-07-29 · A18 4.5M NC Fletcher · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with George Poulos
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
Default
2026-07-23 · A18 4.5M NC Fletcher · #2 Singles · 4.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · A18 4.5M NC Fletcher · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Justin Kelley
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2024-07-22 · OH NEO A55 8.0M Currier · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Gehring
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-07-15 · OH NEO A55 8.0M Currier · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Gehring
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-07-08 · OH NEO A55 8.0M Currier · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Immel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-06-24 · OH NEO A55 8.0M Currier · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Immel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-06-17 · OH NEO A55 8.0M Currier · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Immel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-06-10 · OH NEO A55 8.0M Currier · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Immel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-06-02 · OH NEO A55 8.0M Currier · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Kramer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2024-05-13 · OH NEO A55 8.0M Currier · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Timken
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-10-06 · C 7.5M BR Shaheen · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Tsai
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
100%
6W–0L · 69.5% of games
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 65.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match
#2 Singles
4%
1 match
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer