← Search

Marty Tanner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 23W–19L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history42 matches
W
2026-10-08 · Blake/Reitz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Lefton
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-17 · Blake/Reitz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Lefton
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-07 · Blake/Reitz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Lefton
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-09 · Blake/Reitz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Kahn
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-30 · Boyd/Eveker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margreta Talen
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-02 · Blake/Reitz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Howard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-04 · Blake/Reitz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Reitz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-31 · Eveker/Boyd (65+ 7.0W) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Reitz
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-03 · STLWC/EvekerBoyd/65&Over7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Frawley
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-05-20 · STLWC/EvekerBoyd/65&Over7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Reitz
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2024-05-08 · STLWC/EvekerBoyd/65&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Hoxsey
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-5, 1-0
W
2024-05-01 · STLWC/EvekerBoyd/65&Over7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Reitz
loading the estimate
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
60%
9W–6L · 51.5% of games
7.0
51.9%
14W–13L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
41%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe