← Search

Elizabeth Pettis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 12W–24L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history36 matches
L
2025-03-24 · Pettis, Elizabeth · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-17 · Pettis, Elizabeth · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Pettis Rule
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-02-24 · Pettis, Elizabeth · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-02-10 · Pettis, Elizabeth · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-02-03 · Pettis, Elizabeth · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hallye Lewis
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-12-22 · Sullivan, Ashley · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-11-24 · Sullivan, Ashley · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-11-03 · Sullivan, Ashley · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-09-10 · May, Rosalynn · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rosalynn May
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-08-27 · May, Rosalynn · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hayley Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2024-08-13 · May, Rosalynn · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catherine Pettis Rule
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2024-08-06 · May, Rosalynn · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsey Winborne
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 42.5% of games
3.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.4% of games
3.5
0%
0W–9L · 20% of games
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 49% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
10 matches
#1 Singles
11%
4 matches
#2 Singles
11%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer