← Search

Jonas Nygard

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Minneapolis, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 22W–46L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history68 matches
L
2025-12-11 · Fling Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Palmer
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-20 · Fling Double Trouble · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Fling
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-13 · Fling Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Palmer
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-30 · Fling Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Peterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-23 · Fling Double Trouble · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yongyi Long
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-16 · Fling Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Krause
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-09 · Fling Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rob Stahley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-02-01 · Hassenstab - Fed Express · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2023-01-11 · Hassenstab - Fed Express · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-12-08 · Hassenstab: Fed Express 40+ ES23 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2022-11-16 · Hassenstab: Fed Express 40+ ES23 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-11-02 · Hassenstab: Fed Express 40+ ES23 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
36.1%
22W–39L · 44.4% of games
7.0
0%
0W–7L · 22.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#1 Singles
25%
17 matches
#2 Singles
24%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams