← Search

Peter Krause

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Minneapolis, MN
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
146 matches · 50W–96L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history146 matches
L
2025-12-18 · Fling Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Smetana
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-04 · Fling Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Legwold
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-13 · Fling Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Fling
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-30 · Fling Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rob Stahley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-23 · Fling Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Peterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-16 · Fling Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonas Nygard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-06 · Naistat · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leigh Carlson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7
L
2025-06-29 · Naistat · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Naistat
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7
L
2025-06-22 · Naistat · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Van Dickerson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6
L
2025-06-15 · Naistat · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Naistat
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6
L
2025-06-08 · Naistat · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Ericson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6
L
2025-06-01 · Naistat · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Ericson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
34.9%
15W–28L · 44.6% of games
6.0
80%
8W–2L · 59.6% of games
7.0
27.3%
12W–32L · 39.5% of games
6.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 48.9% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 41.4% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–10L · 22.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
44 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova