← Search

Angela Inloes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
HUNTSVILLE, UT
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
13 matches · 3W–10L · seasons 2019–2023
Match history13 matches
W
2023-03-20 · Ogden-Cox/Johnstun · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with LISA PERMENTER
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-3
W
2023-03-15 · Ogden-Cox/Johnstun · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Curtis
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-2, 1-0
L
2023-01-25 · Ogden-Cox/Johnstun · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Johnstun
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-6
L
2022-11-02 · Ogden-Cox/Johnstun · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2022-07-26 · Bay Hill-Patten · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Patten
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-07-13 · Bay Hill-Patten · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Addeo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2021-07-28 · CMTA @ Liberty Park-Cox/Johnstun · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2021-07-21 · CMTA @ Liberty Park-Cox/Johnstun · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2021-06-30 · CMTA @ Liberty Park-Cox/Johnstun · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2021-02-12 · GC - Patten · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2019-04-19 · Grand Cypress-Kummer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Burt
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2019-04-12 · Grand Cypress-Kummer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Kummer
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 40% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 43.1% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
6 matches
#1 Singles
23%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
1 match
#1 Female Singles
8%
1 match
#2 Singles
8%
1 match
#4 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal